I don't have data but just my personal observations. Many friends took the jabs an year or more ago and most of them really looked not so well. I do not see this anymore - they seem to be well again.
Also, several vaxxed friends got corona and then had massive exposures within their families and did not get it again, meaning they got good protective immunity from their infection, despite being vaccinated. This also supports the statement that the bad effects of the vaccines wane with time.
I know, this is just a subjective observation and anecdote. I think some people suffered badly from he vaccines, but the majority recovered from the hit and will be largely fine.
We are seeing women with multiple early pregnancy losses accompanied each time by allergic upper airway symptoms. The coughing stops when HCG disappears (via immune attack?) and along with it the pregnancy. We also saw unvaccinated employees losing early pregnancies 1 week after the whole department was vaccinated.
Nice write up. Interesting thinking to consider effect of Ukrainian refugees on birth figures!
I had been hoping/expecting a recovery in births for this summer Jun-Jul-Aug would correspond to the lull in vaccination campaign from Aug-Sep-Oct '21.
I predict another dip in births for Aug-Sep-Oct to correspond to the intensive Booster Campaign from Dec-Jan 21/22.
Thanks for bringing in also the French data, that do not look so dramatic.
One of the explanations for those data, is that people were well aware of the possible negative effects of the vaccines on pregnant women so families that were afraid they had to get vaccinated, because of mandates or whatever other reasons, just postponed their family planning. This is just the perfect confounder with the vaccines as it coincides temporally with the jab waves.
It could even explain the higher drop in east Germany - women there were more sceptical toward the jabs but were never the less blackmailed into taking them, so they took the precaution to postpone their pregnancies.
I'm not saying this is it, just bringing a potential alternative explanation. If this is the true cause, we ought to see the catch-up effect, that is a sharp increase of births, somewhere in the spring-summer of 2023.
In France, Covid seems to have interfered with a longer-term trend (declinig births). In contrast, German births have been rather stable in recent years.
Yes, there might be a catch-up effect at some point. It is really quite frustrating (in addition to all the unneccesary suffering) that all of this is playing out at a time scale that is way beyond the attention span of the public.
Currently, everybody's mind is occupied with inflation and nukes and covid is temporarily off the stage.
To be honest, it wasn't us, but rather God or a white hat agency, that brought Omicron, and saved us from mandatory injections and vaccine passports. We'd better man up and prepare because the bad guys ain't giving up, but rather are working to fulfil lauterbach's wet dreams:
"We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate and compared this virus with the naturally circulating Omicron variant. The Omicron S-bearing virus robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity, mainly due to mutations in the receptor binding motif (RBM), yet unlike naturally occurring Omicron, efficiently replicates in cell lines and primary-like distal lung cells. In K18-hACE2 mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80%."
So they combined Omicron and "wild type" SARS Cov-2 to get a deadly and highly infectious pathogen. Good work, boys, you truly serve humanity. I hope you burn in hell.
The variation in birthrates between former East and West Germany is a broader pre-existing demographical trend.
However the birth figures from France have me truly puzzled. They really seem to buck a very strong trend and signal seen in the other European countries post vaccination campaigns.
Agreed, your deviation from mean is very a very useful visualisation.
(I also prefer my visualisation grouping the same months from different years.)
I do like their attempt to represent the 9-month lag between vaccination campaigns and falls in birth figures. But I think it a shame they did not spot there is a stronger correlation with an 8-month lag as I previously discussed.
Why do you predict births figures to normalize around the start of 2023?
Do you have data that suggests that any damage caused by vaccination is only temporary?
No, I do not have data. But when making a prediction, I have to take decisions even absent data, and I am an optimist.
I don't have data but just my personal observations. Many friends took the jabs an year or more ago and most of them really looked not so well. I do not see this anymore - they seem to be well again.
Also, several vaxxed friends got corona and then had massive exposures within their families and did not get it again, meaning they got good protective immunity from their infection, despite being vaccinated. This also supports the statement that the bad effects of the vaccines wane with time.
I know, this is just a subjective observation and anecdote. I think some people suffered badly from he vaccines, but the majority recovered from the hit and will be largely fine.
We are seeing women with multiple early pregnancy losses accompanied each time by allergic upper airway symptoms. The coughing stops when HCG disappears (via immune attack?) and along with it the pregnancy. We also saw unvaccinated employees losing early pregnancies 1 week after the whole department was vaccinated.
Random collection of articles here about anti-fertility vaccines, which have been being developed for several decades: https://medquotes.substack.com/p/publications-worth-mentioning
Nice write up. Interesting thinking to consider effect of Ukrainian refugees on birth figures!
I had been hoping/expecting a recovery in births for this summer Jun-Jul-Aug would correspond to the lull in vaccination campaign from Aug-Sep-Oct '21.
I predict another dip in births for Aug-Sep-Oct to correspond to the intensive Booster Campaign from Dec-Jan 21/22.
Yes, I was thinking along that line as well.
Thanks for bringing in also the French data, that do not look so dramatic.
One of the explanations for those data, is that people were well aware of the possible negative effects of the vaccines on pregnant women so families that were afraid they had to get vaccinated, because of mandates or whatever other reasons, just postponed their family planning. This is just the perfect confounder with the vaccines as it coincides temporally with the jab waves.
It could even explain the higher drop in east Germany - women there were more sceptical toward the jabs but were never the less blackmailed into taking them, so they took the precaution to postpone their pregnancies.
I'm not saying this is it, just bringing a potential alternative explanation. If this is the true cause, we ought to see the catch-up effect, that is a sharp increase of births, somewhere in the spring-summer of 2023.
In France, Covid seems to have interfered with a longer-term trend (declinig births). In contrast, German births have been rather stable in recent years.
Yes, there might be a catch-up effect at some point. It is really quite frustrating (in addition to all the unneccesary suffering) that all of this is playing out at a time scale that is way beyond the attention span of the public.
Currently, everybody's mind is occupied with inflation and nukes and covid is temporarily off the stage.
To be honest, it wasn't us, but rather God or a white hat agency, that brought Omicron, and saved us from mandatory injections and vaccine passports. We'd better man up and prepare because the bad guys ain't giving up, but rather are working to fulfil lauterbach's wet dreams:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.13.512134v1
"We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate and compared this virus with the naturally circulating Omicron variant. The Omicron S-bearing virus robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity, mainly due to mutations in the receptor binding motif (RBM), yet unlike naturally occurring Omicron, efficiently replicates in cell lines and primary-like distal lung cells. In K18-hACE2 mice, while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80%."
So they combined Omicron and "wild type" SARS Cov-2 to get a deadly and highly infectious pathogen. Good work, boys, you truly serve humanity. I hope you burn in hell.
el gato has a marvellous piece on it: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/omicron-gain-of-function-research
The question is: should we be thankful that this is being reported on in an official paper, or is this one more reason to worry?
I think we should worry. That's for sure the tip of the iceberg and being so shameless to officially perform the research and
even publish it speaks volumes of how they perceive themselves as ubermensch.
On a second thought, their arrogance could be their fall. Nothing is certain yet and any assumption that makes you feel powerless is useless.
The variation in birthrates between former East and West Germany is a broader pre-existing demographical trend.
However the birth figures from France have me truly puzzled. They really seem to buck a very strong trend and signal seen in the other European countries post vaccination campaigns.
I collected the equivalent data for all larger Western European countries and will post the diagrams. Then we can stare at them in wonder.
Have you seen the report linked by Epimetheus last month?
https://fackel.substack.com/p/depopulation-watch-official-data
https://www.initiative-corona.info/fileadmin/dokumente/Geburtenrueckgang-Europe-EN.pdf
https://www.initiative-corona.info/fileadmin/dokumente/Geburtenrueckgang-Europe-DE.pdf
Do you know who the authors are?
Yes, I have seen the report. Impressive work; I just prefer my way of presenting the data.
Main author seems to be some Raimund Hagemann; this guy (also to be found as RealDataHero):
https://odysee.com/@News23:a/19052022:7
https://odysee.com/@Dissens:e/RaimundHagemann:1
Agreed, your deviation from mean is very a very useful visualisation.
(I also prefer my visualisation grouping the same months from different years.)
I do like their attempt to represent the 9-month lag between vaccination campaigns and falls in birth figures. But I think it a shame they did not spot there is a stronger correlation with an 8-month lag as I previously discussed.
It is a good thing that many people are looking at the beast from different angles.