Vax injured in '68, antibiotic injured as an adult with many other medical horror stories. Just released first Substack explaining "coincidist", my new term for folks who blame pharmaceutical harm on coincidence. Some are believers, others are shills...
Vax injured in '68, antibiotic injured as an adult with many other medical horror stories. Just released first Substack explaining "coincidist", my new term for folks who blame pharmaceutical harm on coincidence. Some are believers, others are shills...
https://open.substack.com/pub/coincidism/p/counter-coincidism-101?
Thank you very much" I agree with you and Fenton/Neill.
Nevertheless, I have 2 questions:
The authors defined the time window of interest as "June 1 to Sept 30, 2022", i.e. the 4 typically warm summer months.
1. Almost all individual observations (apart from those in the very old) lasted 4 months, nevertheless the authors preferred a time adjustment?
For hiding problems in the model?
2. I am surprised with the chosen time window (sorry, I did not completely read the articlle), as incidence of C19 should be rather low during summer.
Meaning: Even if data and model would be correct. it might tell us very little for the reat of the year.
Yes, incidence was much lower than in the preceding winter, but June-Sept 2022 exactly covers a little summer wave.
https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus/country/united-kingdom
Safe and effective.
...way to get into The Lancet.
Thanks for the clear explanation!
39m jabs to avoid 1k deaths and to incur 10k severe adverse effects.
Great thank you. More trickery.